Review article | International Journal of Life Science and Social Studies Education 2023, Vol. 1(1) 118-135
Murat Baş
pp. 118 - 135 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/ijlssse.2023.1074.05 | Manu. Number: ijlssse.2023.005
Published online: December 31, 2023 | Number of Views: 11 | Number of Download: 25
Abstract
The life science course aims to equip students in the first three grades of primary school with fundamental behaviors such as being a good person and citizen, and adapting to society. This course plays an important role in developing students' critical thinking, problem-solving, and other skills necessary for their social lives. It is emphasized that the life science course contributes to the educational process by establishing strong connections with various disciplines, and particularly that its relationship with mathematics should not be overlooked. This study, which adopts an interdisciplinary approach, aims to examine the integration of mathematical concepts in the life science course. Research shows that the life science course is effective in providing students with various knowledge, skills, values, and attitudes. The integration of mathematics into life science education allows students to acquire a broad skill set while enabling the analysis of complex biological data. However, there are some challenges to this integration, including resistance to curriculum changes and student math anxiety. To overcome these challenges, it is important to create an inclusive school environment and provide students with supportive learning experiences. In conclusion, the inclusion of mathematical knowledge in Life Science courses enables students to gain analytical thinking and problem-solving skills, allowing them to tackle complex issues. This study highlights the importance of interdisciplinary integration, revealing the role and benefits of mathematics within the life science curriculum.
Keywords: Life science, mathematics, curriculum.
How to Cite this Article? |
---|
APA 6th edition Harvard Chicago 16th edition |
References |
---|
Akça, Z., & Beşoluk, Ş. (2021). A historical perspective on the evolution of ınterdisciplinary trends to stem in science education.Cumhuriyet International Journal of Education, 10(2). Akdeniz, F. (2013). İstatistikte yeni eğilimler ve yöntemler [New trends and methods in statistics]. Journal of Statistical Research, 10(3), 35-48. Amaç, Z. (2021). Kapsayıcı eğitim ve ilkokul öğretmenleri: sistematik bir inceleme [Inclusive education and primary school teachers: A systematic review]. Electronic Journal of Education Sciences, 10(19), 74-97. Baş, M., Tay, B., & Tertemiz, N. I. (2021). The effects of ıntegrated mathematics and life sciences teaching on primary school students' value acquisition. International Journal of Modern Education Studies, 5(2), 487-515. Drake, S. M. (1993). Planning integrated curriculum: The Call to Adventure (ED355660). ERIC. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED355660 Ferrari, S., & Cribari-Neto, F. (2019). Enhancing mathematics performance through active learning. SEGA. Fisher, R. A. (1999). The genetical theory of natural selection: A complete variorum edition. Oxford University. Franklin, J., & Miller, J. (2020). Analyzing climate impact on biodiversity with regression models. Oxford. Herdman, E. A., (2006) Derleme makale yazımında, konferans ve bildiri sunumu hazırlamada pratik bilgiler [Practical information in writing review articles, preparing conference and paper presentations]. Hemşirelikte Eğitim ve Araştırma Dergisi, 3(1), 2-4 Kahng, S., Hausman, N. L., Fisher, A. B., Donaldson, J. M., Cox, J. R., Lugo, M., & Wiskow, K. M. (2015). The safety of functional analyses of self‐injurious behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 48(1), 107-114. Karaca, D. (2020) Matematik dersinde kullanılan gerçek yaşam problemlerinin ilkokul 4. sınıf öğrencilerinin yardımseverlik tutumlarına ve matematiğe yönelik tutumlarına etkisi [The effect of real life problems used in mathematics on the benevolence attitudes and mathematics attitudes of 4th grade students]. (Publication No.638145) [Master thesis, Sakarya University]. National Thesis Center. Karasar, N. (2008). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi [Scientific research methodology]. Nobel. Kaung, M., Kyi, T. T., Aung, N. M., Kyaw, M. P., Min, M., Htet, Z. W., ... & Hanson, J. (2015). The prognostic utility of bedside assessment of adults hospitalized with malaria in Myanmar: a retrospective analysis. Malaria Journal, 14, 1-9. Keskin, Y., Öksüz, Y., Gelen, İ., & Yılmaz, H. B. (2012). İlköğretim 5. sınıf öğrencilerinin bazı evrensel değerleri kazanım düzeylerinin karşılaştırılması (Samsun ili örneği) [A comparative study on the acquisition levels of certain universal values among fifth grade primary school students (Case of Samsun)]. Ondokuz Mayıs University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 31(2), 351-374. Kilpatrick, W. H. (1918). The project method: the use of the purposeful act in the educational process. Annual review of applied linguistics, 20, 34-55. Kovarik, D. N., Patterson, D. G., Cohen, C., Sanders, E. A., Peterson, K. A., Porter, S. G., & Chowning, J. T. (2013). Bioinformatics education in high school: implications for promoting science, technology, engineering, and mathematics careers. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 12(3), 441-459. Leahey, L. K. (1999). An interdisciplinary approach to integrated curriculum. [Unpublished Master’s thesis]. Rowan University. Lindfield, G., & Penny, J. (2018). Numerical methods: using MATLAB. Academic. Mahiroğlu, A., & Coşar, M. (2008). Web tabanlı uzaktan eğitimde sıra, hız ve içerik kontrollerinin akademik başarıya etkisi [Effects of content, pacing and sequence controls on academic success in web based distance education]. The Journal of Turkish Educational Sciences, 6(1), 63-83. Meydan, A., & Bahçe, A. (2010). Hayat bilgisi öğretiminde değerlerin kazandırılma düzeylerinin öğretmen görüşlerine göre değerlendirilmesi. [Assessment of value acquisition levels in life sciences teaching according to teacher opinions] International Journal Of Eurasia Social Sciences, 1(1), 20-37. Ministry of National Education [MoNE]. (2018). İlkokul hayat bilgisi dersi öğretim programı ve kılavuzu (1-3. Sınıflar) [Primary school life science curriculum and guide (Grades 1-3)]. Devlet Kitapları. Pagano, M., & Gauvreau, K. (2018). Biostatistics: Foundations for biological data interpretation. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1-2), 35-47 Perkins, D. N., & Salomon, G. (1989). Are cognitive skills context-bound?. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 16-25. Piaget, J. (1971). Méthodologie des relations interdisciplinaires. Archives de Philosophie, 539-549. Policar, L. (2008). How interdisciplinary methodology İmproves motivation, creativity, and critical thinking. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Northcentral University. Policar, L. (2008). How interdisciplinary methodology improves motivation, creativity, and critical thinking. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Northcentral University. Posner, G. J. (1992). Analyzing the curriculum. United States: Mc Graw Hill. Pring, R. (1971). Curriculum integration. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 5(2), 170-200. Schwartz, S. H. (2012). An overview of the schwartz theory of basic values. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1), 1-20]. http://dx.doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1116. Selçuk, Z. (2000). Gelişim ve öğrenme [Development and learning]. Nobel. Shoshani, A. (2021). Growth mindset in the maths classroom: A key to teachers’ well-being and effectiveness. Teachers and Teaching, 27(8), 730-752. Sönmez, V. (2005). Hayat bilgisi öğretimi ve öğretmen kılavuzu [Life sciences teaching and teacher's guide]. Anı. Sözer, M. A., & Yıldırım, G. (2017). Yapılandırmacı perspektiften 3. sınıf hayat bilgisi öğretiminin incelenmesi: Ders-öğretmen kılavuz kitapları [Examining the third-grade life sciences teaching from a constructivist perspective: lesson-teacher guide books]. Ahi Evran University Journal of Kırşehir Education Faculty, 18(1), 451-469. Şahinkaya, N., Aladağ, E., & Aladağ, S. (2012). Türk hayat bilgisi müfredatındaki matematik ve hayat bilgisi dersleri arasındaki ilişkinin belirlenmesi [Determining the relationship between life studies and mathematics lectures in turkish life studies curriculum] Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 538-542. Tan, M. N. (2015). Ortaokul öğrencilerinin matematik kaygısı, öğrenilmiş çaresizlik ve matematiğe yönelik tutum düzeyleri arasındaki ilişkilerin incelenmesi [Examining the relationships between mathematics anxiety, learned helplessness, and attitude towards mathematics among middle school students] (Publication No. 407580). [Master thesis, Necmettin Erbakan University]. National Thesis Center. Tapper, T. (2007). The governance of british higher education: The struggle for policy control. International Handbook of Teacher Education: 3(2) 311-346. Tay, B., & Ünlü, İ. (2014). İlkokul yurt bilgisi, toplum ve ülke incelemeleri ve sosyal bilgiler dersleri öğretim programlarında değer ve değerler eğitimi [Values and value education in primary school geography, society and country studies, and social studies curriculum] In Turan, R. & Ulusoy, K. (Ed.). Farklı yönleriyle değerler eğitimi [Value education from different aspects]. Pegem. Tay, B., & Yıldırım, K. (2013). Bilgisayar destekli öğretimin hayat bilgisi öğretimi dersinde başarıya etkisi ve yönteme ilişkin öğretmen adaylarının görüşleri [The effect of computer assisted instruction on achievement in life studies instruction, and student views about computer assisted instruction]. Uşak University Journal of Social Sciences, 6(1), 84-110. Taylor, J. M. (2011). Interdisciplinary authentic assessment: cognitive expectations and student performance. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Pepperdine. Türe, H., & Ersoy, A. F. (2014). Sosyal bilgiler öğretmenlerinin hoşgörü algısı [Social studies teachers’ perceptions of tolerance]. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 5(2), 31-56. Varış, F. (1996). Eğitimde program geliştirme: teori ve teknikler [Program development in education: theory and techniques]. Alkım. Vars, G. F. (1991). Integrated curriculum in historical perspective. [Integrated curriculum in historical perspective] Educational Leadership, 49(2), 14-15. Von Glasersfeld, E. (1998). In constructivism in science education. Springer. Xu, L. J., Yu, S. Q., Chen, S. D., & Ji, S. P. (2021). Effects of the flipped classroom model on student performance and interaction with a peer-coach strategy. Educational Studies, 47(3), 292-311. Yalçın, M. (2013). Biyoloji dersinde disiplinler arası çalışmaların öğrenme üzerine etkilerinin incelenmesi [Investigating the effects of ınterdisciplinary studies on learning in biology lessons] Journal of Research in Education and Teaching, 2(3), 117-122. Yavuz, A. (2017). İlkokul hayat bilgisi dersinde bilişim teknolojileri destekli yansıtıcı düşünme etkinliklerinin öğrencilerin ders başarısına ve tutumuna etkisi [The effect of ıt-supported reflective thinking activities on students' success and attitude in primary school life sciences class] [Unpublished master thesis]. Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University. Yıldırım, A. (1996). Disiplinler arası öğretim kavramı ve programlar açısından doğurduğu sonuçlar [The concept of interdisciplinary teaching and its consequences in terms of programs] Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 12, 89-94. Yıldırım, A. (1999). Nitel araştırma yöntemlerinin temel özellikleri ve eğitim araştırmalarındaki yeri ve önemi [Basic features of qualitative research methods and their place and ımportance in educational research]. Education and Science, 23(112), 7-17. Yolcu, F. A. (2013). İlköğretim düzeyinde performans görevi ve proje uygulamaları sürecinde disiplinler arası yaklaşımın etkililiği üzerine bir çalışma [A study on the effectiveness of ınterdisciplinary approaches in performance tasks and project applications at the primary education]. (Publication No. 339039) [Master thesis, Necmettin Erbakan University]. National Thesis Center. |